Human rights researcher, Dr Michael Gyan Nyarko, has spoken out against the anti-LGBTQ+ bill, explaining that his apprehensions go beyond the recent proposals of the non-custodial sentences.
During an appearance on JoyNews’ Newsfile, Dr Nyarko emphasized that a democratic society should be open to a wide range of different viewpoints and opinions, even if they conflict with others’ beliefs.
He expressed that it is unjust to punish individuals for their actions or beliefs that others disagree with, as this goes against the fundamental values of democracy. He believes that it’s acceptable to disagree with LGBTQ rights due to religious beliefs, but criminal consequences for such disagreements are not justified.
Dr Nyarko pointed out that there’s a difference between moral disapproval of an action and criminal punishment for that action. He also noted that many things happen in society that people morally disapprove of, but that doesn’t mean those actions should be criminalized.
The anti-LGBTQ+ bill, which has been the subject of controversy and heated debates, proposes three-to-five-year jail terms for those promoting or sponsoring LGBTQ activities, and a minimum of 6 months to a maximum of 3 years for those caught in the act. The bill’s progress was stalled for months, angering its proponents.
Lead campaigner for the anti-LGBT bill, Sam George, has been vocal in calling out those who have been influenced by pro-LGBTQ campaigners, sparking further controversy.
This perspective from Dr Nyarko adds to the ongoing debate surrounding the anti-LGBTQ+ bill and raises critical questions about the intersection of personal beliefs, democratic values, and criminal justice.
