Former Deputy Attorney-General and Minister for Justice Joseph Dindiok Kpemka Esq has raised concerns about the definitive and regrettable statements being made by individuals regarding the passage of the Anti-LGBTQ+ bill by Parliament.
In an interview on JoyNews’ Newsfile, Mr. Kpemka emphasized that the ultimate authority to determine the constitutionality of a law passed by Parliament lies with the Supreme Court.
He cautioned against making conclusive statements until the Supreme Court has delivered its pronouncement on the matter. Mr. Kpemka highlighted that until the Supreme Court issues a definitive ruling, any assertions about the constitutionality or otherwise of the Anti-LGBTQ+ bill remain speculative and based on personal opinions.
The Deputy Attorney-General stressed that individuals should not assume that their viewpoints are definitive, as the Supreme Court has the jurisdiction to interpret and apply the law in accordance with societal norms. He mentioned that jumping to conclusions about the constitutionality of the law without the Supreme Court’s pronouncement may be premature.
Mr. Kpemka reiterated that when the Anti-LGBTQ+ bill is brought before the Supreme Court, both sides of the argument will be presented, and the constitutional principles at stake will be thoroughly examined. He underscored the importance of allowing the Supreme Court to make a determination based on legal principles and the interpretation of the law, rather than preemptive assumptions.
It is crucial to await the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Anti-LGBTQ+ bill before drawing any firm conclusions about its constitutionality. This cautious approach ensures that legal matters are resolved through the appropriate channels and uphold the rule of law in Ghana.
