Africas ‘flying presidents’ are coming under fire as both the Kenyan and Nigerian leaders face domestic criticism for their frequent foreign trips.
In Kenya, President Uhuru Kenyatta is facing backlash from opposition leaders and citizens for what they view as excessive travel abroad. Critics argue that the president’s frequent trips are a waste of taxpayers’ money and are not bringing any tangible benefits to the country.
Similarly, in Nigeria, President Muhammadu Buhari is also facing criticism for his numerous foreign trips. Critics argue that the president’s absence from the country has had a negative impact on governance and has failed to yield any substantial gains for the nation.
Both leaders have defended their extensive travel as necessary for engaging with the international community and attracting foreign investment. However, their critics argue that the perceived benefits of these trips are outweighed by the costs and the neglect of domestic issues.
This issue has sparked a wider debate about the role of African leaders in international affairs and the balance between engaging globally and addressing local needs. The controversy surrounding the ‘flying presidents’ highlights the growing demand for greater accountability and transparency in the conduct of African leaders.
